TATIO FLY: IF YOU'VE SEEN ... NO ME 
The agreement establishes rules according to the native peoples or indigenous communities, provides criteria mandates that the state increasingly acting on matters of interest or territorial space, should make inquiries the community, something that has never been respected and even our regional leading academics, people with long experience in environmental matters, nor were they took into account their technical and scientific approach, when they were invited to state their position on the project at The Geysers.
This consultation is a mere imitation to make as it regards the community, but it's actually worth what they say fungus. Your opinion does not matter, because in this case the indigenous communities from the outset, expressed concern about the negative impact this would have, and the carelessness with which they have been implementing different initiatives.
The most dramatic is that public authorities, including courts, not provide the slightest importance to these groups, and less, taking into account their views, and the fact is that, time proved them right.
What happened at The Geysers is the eloquent expression that institutions do not meet an adequate institutional framework, it does not work and still a disaster. The State should review its environmental institutions because it always reacts late and without warning.
actions
not know where the authority has been proactive, preventing or being above the projects. In all environmental disaster we have seen in our region, environmental institutions has been late, so messy, and the resources to undertake this task and others simply through negligence or incompetence has never been presented. The fact is that in our country, nothing ever happens. There are no measures and no responsibility. That is why I demanded sanctions. The company, state institutions and those responsible for this project.
What we reject, is the failure in the civil service and bad business practices that favor economic interests over the common good and the environment. It is not acceptable the argument of the Minister, which states that lack laws and regulations. I think what is missing is good reason, common sense and respect for our environment and our brothers of the community.
Northern Geothermal Company, and had two environmental penalties. This is not a new issue, this was repeated and that's where my concern in the public domain. If Corema was aware that the company failed to meet monthly. Why went ahead with the project?
What happens when the leading state enterprise, Codelco is involved?, Do you lack resources? Do you have limitations as a partner to control and monitor the project?, Or is it just an order to pass Codelco silver, no one would audit properly your destination? Codelco apparently competes with ENAP to see which of the two, has been negligent or disrespectful to the environment. I can say with propriety, because I have two communities which are affecting human dignity. People are slowly dying. Calama, which has contaminated the Loa River countless times and generation plants Electric 
Tocopilla, which are in private hands, but his beginnings were part of Codelco. Result: total saturation contamination.
The Geysers. A national asset, global tourism assets and ancient place of worship, not can be simply handled by bureaucratic criteria state that border on political pressure to carry it forward, to protect business from someone's pocket and boast about something you do not have. Respect for our environment!
DATE: August 22, 2009 
is 
